SAFE, AFFORDABLE & AVAILABLE HOUSING
The Western U.S. and Pacific Basin Territories have faced economic challenges and population shifts in recent decades. Rural housing affordability and availability have been affected by limited supply and production, regulations, speculation, and an influx of remote workers and retirees moving from urban to rural areas.
Safe, affordable, and available housing is essential for the health and productivity of families and individuals. This, in turn, helps maintain stable consumer prices, while local ownership and management of housing keep wages and incomes flowing within local economies. Achieving this requires a blend of peer networks and research to assess effective, balanced housing strategies and tailor them to local needs and values.
The WRDC gathers information and resources of use by our rural partners in their pursuit of healthy housing markets characterized by the following qualities:
- Local Control—locally owned and managed, accountable to local residents and policy makers, and keeps wages and incomes circulating in the local economy
- Affordability—housing costs below 30% of Household Income that allow more tenant income to support essential spending on taxable goods and services
- Permanence—rents for essential workers and limited-income residents that are sheltered from policy and market shifts
- Diverse—a range of housing choices and access that support independence, stability, and prosperity for all
- Health and Value—housing designed to reduce lifecycle costs, support resident wellbeing, and limit taxpayer impacts
The qualities mentioned above promote a healthy housing ecosystem, where residents of all ages and incomes enjoy the stability necessary to engage with and contribute to their community. In this environment, employers benefit from a reliable local workforce, and the costs associated with various social programs as well as public health and safety services are minimized.
Economic development role. Housing affordability supports sustainable economic development in many ways. Employers benefit from a diverse range of housing types and price points near employment centers.
They recognize that a stable labor force supports planning, productivity, and competitiveness, while long commute times or financial strain can negatively impact performance and reliability. Economic development professionals recognize housing as critical infrastructure, alongside schools, broadband, and healthcare, essential to recruiting and retaining outside investment, good-paying jobs, and dynamic workforce development. Economists know that local housing control helps keep wages circulating within the local economy.
Fair housing choice = economic opportunity. Fair housing laws give us all the right to live where we choose and can afford. ‘Housing choice’ affects access to essential community assets, such as healthcare, education, and employment. Policies that distribute housing types and prices across neighborhoods and communities support HUD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule, designed to mitigate decades of de jure discrimination described in Segregated by Design. The resulting housing choice supports community and economic resilience. Always include the voices of diverse populations when evaluating comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, or development.
Inclusive design gets customers in the door. Residential construction that meets basic visitability standards reaches a broader market and enables us to age in place. This reduces overall housing costs, saves Medicaid dollars, and improves community cohesion and quality of life.
Affordability = stability. Since the National Housing Act of 1937, housing costs below 30% of household income were considered affordable. When costs exceed 30%, households are considered housing cost-burdened; above 50%, households are severely cost-burdened. This puts households and communities at risk.
Public subsidy to private equity. Residential speculation and housing scarcity mean a rise in foregone spending— money lost to an economy and tax base owing to housing cost burden—an estimated $1.05B loss for Idaho in 2021 alone (Source: Colorado Futures Center). Housing displacement and instability caused by inflation have triggered a wave of first-time homelessness, with significant individual and social costs. We now understand clearly that ‘Homelessness is a Housing Problem,’ and that accounting for externalized costs is key to sound policy.
Diverse housing markets benefit everyone. When working households, retirees, and others can comfortably meet basic costs associated with local housing, they have more time, money, and energy to invest locally. Communities benefit from less traffic, more stability, and engaged residents. School and job attendance go up, while public costs tied to community health and safety go down. Stable households in socioeconomically diverse communities are better able to build social capital and cultivate supportive networks essential to economic mobility and opportunity, which in turn reduces their overall reliance on social (i.e., taxpayer-funded) assistance.
NIMBY opposition to affordability or density can increase costs and often has a ‘disparate impact’ on protected classes, perpetuating effects of discriminatory redlining. Developers have successfully sued communities that reject otherwise compliant developments when discriminatory permitting policies or practices are evident.
“Stable housing lets each of us build the ‘social capital’ needed to reach our full potential.”
Housing is made affordable either by increasing wages to compensate for high housing costs, using tax supports to subsidize wage and consumer costs, or lowering the net costs of housing location, ownership, condition, and efficiency design. Sustainable housing reflects factors that reduce life-cycle, transportation, and other expenses.
Local needs require local partners and solutions. A sustainable and diverse range of housing options begins with understanding the role of housing in economic and community development; it also requires teamwork among interested parties. These include housing, community, and economic development professionals, policy makers, building officials, planners, and developers, people with disabilities, seniors (and seniors in training), along with business, corporate, neighborhood, and community leaders who identify local needs and define the scope and direction of planning efforts. Local control of housing and community assets = accountability and stability.
“Employers know that housing is where jobs go to sleep at night.”
The Rural West’s housing crisis limits workforce development. Employers throughout rural America say the lack of housing options means they can’t recruit or retain the essential workers they need—from hospitals, education or retail, to construction workers, care providers or first responders. We’re all affected.
- Healthy housing markets are like ecosystems—diversity equals resilience and durability
- Speculative investors and NIMBY fuel our housing crisis by perpetuating housing shortages
- Workers provide a subsidy to employers and customers by commuting long distances or living in substandard housing to provide services—at a price we consider affordable
- Housing that accommodates essential workers, students, retirees, seniors or persons living with disability helps families, knowledge and incomes stay put
- In addition to flexible zoning and regulation, we make housing “affordable” one of two ways:
- Increase wages indefinitely to keep pace w real estate speculation and housing shortages
- Subsidize employers/consumer prices w project- or tenant-based supports (using taxes) and increased housing production
Conservation and preservation matter. We all know the most cost-effective energy investment is in negawatts—energy saved through conservation. Likewise, every community has what’s called naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) or legacy affordability. Legacy housing has limited debt, reflects lower construction costs, and contains significant embodied energy. Preserving that existing affordability is like patching the holes in a leaky bucket before trying to fill it.
Conversion, gentrification, and speculation erode affordability. Converting legacy housing to investment property, luxury units, or short-term rentals erodes affordability and limits housing choices. New ownership and flipping mean new financing costs and higher rents, and more holes in the bucket.
New construction costs, supply, or demand. Labor, material, financing, regulatory, and NIMBY costs mean we can’t easily build our way out of a housing shortage. We need to acknowledge that the laws of supply and demand don’t apply equally to housing and commodities like dairy, sugar, oil, or corn. Most commodity prices respond to market shifts within hours, days, or weeks, while housing prices change over years or decades. Traditional commodities all rely on taxpayer support to reduce prices at the point of sale or use; why should housing be any different?
Re-think residential codes. Revise minimum lot size and square foot rules—along with fees, occupancy limits, and household definitions—to support ‘Neighborhood-friendly development.’ Tiny Homes, ADUs, and density bonuses can reduce development and infrastructure costs. These tools work best when they preserve local ownership of housing, keeping wages and incomes local.
Land banking. Local government, school and highway districts, churches, and private employers should proactively inventory, protect, acquire, and designate key parcels for mixed-use and workforce/affordable residential development. Establish a community fund to purchase tax-delinquent properties each year to support a local housing strategy. Land near transit hubs, employment centers, and services is an essential asset.
Aging-Friendly Design and Development. New single-family residential developments should be accessible to meet the growing demand for homes and neighborhoods that cater to people of all ages and abilities, allowing them to live independently.
Remove land costs from the equation. Community land trusts, housing trusts, or social housing models hold property in trust via a public or nonprofit entity. Land is leased to qualifying homeowners, who own the improvements and build equity. Alternately, trust or social housing models may develop rental housing for households in specific income ranges or essential workers to preserve long-term affordability.
Impact and crowd investment. Federal funds involve legal and regulatory requirements that can inflate the cost per unit and require large developments. Impact or crowd investing can yield positive, measurable impacts alongside a financial return. This market-based approach to financing missing middle or neighborhood-friendly residential development can reduce costs and invite local investment. Distributing smaller-footprint projects across communities can also reduce opposition.
Engage local employers. Remember that diverse housing types and price points represent both a perpetual income boost to workers and a valuable recruitment and retention tool for local public and private employers.
Workforce development and productivity depend on an adequate supply of workforce housing, where the workforce includes all individuals who work for a wage. Employers can partner with other stakeholders to finance and develop housing units that meet the needs of key staff positions and wages.
Cooperative tenant ownership and HomeShare. Housing cooperatives create housing stability in many countries and states. Tenants form cooperatives and acquire government-backed or private financing to secure housing with a mix of private and shared space. Like resident-owned communities, this expands local ownership opportunities, builds equity for households, offers flexible living arrangements, and preserves residential capacity. HomeShare connects home providers and home seekers through Silvernest; this taps unused housing capacity and provides extra income, security, and companionship for many homeowners.